porno

AT&T Says NO to the FCC’s $100 Million Throttling Fine



/ 1 year ago

speed-test

If you read about it, AT&T just got fined last month for allegedly throttling customers with ‘unlimited’ data plan. To sum it up, the FCC saw that AT&T had been “severely” slowing down users while not telling those users about the caps placed on their speed. So, they decided to fine them with a staggering $100 million.

If you think the FCC is asking for a lot of money, they apparently aren’t. According to them, they first decided to fine AT&T with up to $16,000 per violation for millions of violations, but the figures were so ridiculously high that they went with the latter sum instead. Even so, AT&T now thinks that they did nothing wrong.

“The Commission’s findings that consumers and competition were harmed are devoid of factual support and wholly implausible,” AT&T wrote in a response to the FCC. “Its ‘moderate’ forfeiture penalty of $100 million is plucked out of thin air, and the injunctive sanctions it proposes are beyond the Commission’s authority.”

AT&T now states that the FCC is infringing their First Amendment right by demanding the company to tell customers of their FCC rule violation. But let’s face it, when you say ‘unlimited’, you don’t really mention about network slowdowns. Another interesting thing is that AT&T recently changed their policy for throttling LTE users after they pass 5GB of data. This means that unlimited data LTE users now get throttled during the time when the network is highly congested. Previously, unlimited data LTE customers used to get throttled for the rest of the month after passing 5GB of download. But despite AT&T’s attempts to convince the FCC it did nothing wrong, they are also facing a court order from the commission, which aims to bring millions of dollars of refunds to consumers.

In my opinion, throttling customer speeds, either on mobile data or the fiber optic speed you ‘get’ at home is not an option. I know a lot of internet providers face huge amounts of network congestion, but is that our or the network’s fault? I think mobile and ISP providers should focus on spending that money on upgrading their networks to handle more connections instead of keeping the speed throttling habit. What do you think?

Thank you Arstechnica for providing us with this information


Topics: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • roppu

    You sometimes think that at this internet age, it would be good to live in the US, you have more options and stuff, then you remember there are dickass companys like AT&T and Comcast who fuck up their consumers. No thank you, il stay in my EU and Estonia, cheap and fast internet 🙂

  • roppu

    You sometimes think that at this internet age, it would be good to live in the US, you have more options and stuff, then you remember there are dickass companys like AT&T and Comcast who fuck up their consumers. No thank you, il stay in my EU and Estonia, cheap and fast internet 🙂

  • Terry Barber

    The entire problem is transparency. And the marketing guys hate transparency.

  • Terry Barber

    The entire problem is transparency. And the marketing guys hate transparency.