porno

Blade-less Turbines Could Be The Future!



/ 2 years ago

1784696d15ccf0f747e945f4c6b9366271

We’ve all seen them. The giant fans that spin (on occasion) and are said to help power the world without needing to worry about the pollution that may be generated. The problem is a lot of people don’t like the look of them (bar the fact that unless you have the right conditions the fans won’t spin), but what if someone came up with a new design?

A company in Spain is looking to do just that, Vortex Bladeless are looking to remove the unsightly blades and change how the wind can help power your homes. The giant metal pillars are instead designed to shake, a movement created by the air flowing around the pillars rather than forcing and pushing a giant blade instead. Typically buildings are designed to avoid the kind of wind and vortices that these pillars are instead designed to capture and use. While normally utilizing these by creating a building to oscillate at a specific frequency that the wind may occur at. Instead, Vortex states that by using magnets they are able to adjust the turbines in real time, getting the most out of the wind without having to wait for the opportune moment.

By converting the movement into electricity, Vortex claims to be able to reduce the cost of turbines by almost 40%. The reason for this price reduction is simple, very little maintenance is required if there are no gears or moving mechanics instead. While also cutting initial build costs by almost half due to the lack of expensive blades the blade-less design also has a small problem. The design only captures on average around 30% less energy than a regular turbine, something you could argue is offset by the smaller pieces of land they occupy and silent almost continuous running.

I’m all for environmental energy. Be it solar, wind or tidal renewable energy and electric vehicles are going to help cut pollution and make the world a better place to life very soon in the future, anything that helps bring that future closer can only be good right?

Thank you The Verge for providing us with this information.


Topics: , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Barry Mason

    IMO they are uglier than a conventional turbine. Your fact checkers need to do their job better because a conventional turbine does not need specific conditions to make it spin, they will spin and generate electricity in the lightest of breezes. Also if you think about it this thing is going to need more wind to “vibrate” then a conventional turbine would require to spin. and finally the “silent” claim you get a decent wind and it will howl through this thing and make as much if now more noise than a conventional turbine. The only thing this has going for it is it can be installed in smaller spaces.