ATI Radeon HD 5670 512MB Graphics Card Video Review

Today we are looking at the ATI Radeon HD5670 512MB graphics card. This particular card utilizes the latest technology from AMD, as well as sporting the newest DirectX11 platform whilst using little power and being the cheapest card in AMD’s DX11 range.

Manufactured and supplied by:

Specifications

Product page can be located here.

• Chipset Manufacturer – AMD
• GPU – Redwood
• Core Clock Speed – 775MHz
• Stream Processing Units – 400
• Memory Clock Speed – 1.0GHz
• Memory Size – 512MB
• Memory Interface – 128-bit
• Memory Type – GDDR5

Images

Conclusion

This graphics card is perfect for anyone living in the past, possibly with an ATI or nVidia based card, and wants to see what all the fuss is about with DirectX 11, and these new fangled graphics cards in the 5xxx series from ATI. This card has all of the premium features (ATI Eyefinity, ATI Stream technology and DirectX 11) whilst maintaining a valueable pricing point. With the 512mb version sitting at a very low £72, and the 1gb version at £85, this card really is singing out to enthusaists hearts (and their wallets). Also with this card, no extra power is needed, and it runs at a extremely low 51watts at load and with the ability for a multi-monitor setup and the ability to play the latest games, i can’t give it anything else but 5 out of 5 stars.

eTeknix Rating

Pros

• Sub £100
• Latest DX11 architecture
• Low power output
• No extra power needed
• Latest technology
• Low profile

Cons

• None

We have rated this 5 out of 5 stars

Thank you to AMD for supplying eTeknix with this product.

You can comment on this review below, or can discuss it more in depth here in our forums.

3 Responses to “ATI Radeon HD 5670 512MB Graphics Card Video Review”

1. thress minujte says:

   March 19, 2010 at 08:47

   fast forward 3 minutes if you dont want to listen to useless info
2. Andy Ruffell says:

   January 22, 2010 at 21:39

   Rob Dougan – Clubbed To Death

   Andy
3. Kerel says:

   January 22, 2010 at 21:38

   Anybody know the name of the song used in the video?