So with the imminent launch of the highly anticipated AMD Fury graphics cards, it was only a matter of time before someone accidentally published a review before the NDA. In this case, DigitalStorm dropped the ball.
As we all know, the AMD Fury range is based on the newest Fiji architecture and will feature High Bandwidth Memory v1. Previously rumoured to offer AMD R9 295×2 performance in a package as small as the NVIDIA GTX 970 ITX, this was set to be one of the best graphics card innovations in years.
We have covered a lot of news regarding the AMD R9 Fury range, how it should be a better performer than the Titan X, the same cost as a GTX 980, the same size as a GTX 970 ITX and water cooled like its older brother, the R9 295×2. However, solid performance details have been scarce with only one or two charts popping up and all contradicting each other.
We will keep this post updated as we get more details, so stay tuned to your F5 button.
Was this the performance you was expecting from the new AMD Fury X? Let us know in the comments.
Thank you to VideoCardz for providing us with this information
Set the curve with the CORSAIR XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 OLED Bendable UltraWide Gaming Display, built…
Say hello to the future of graphics, with the MSI GeForce RTX 4090 GAMING X…
This Scan Gamer RTX features the 8GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 graphics card featuring new…
The MAG series fights alongside gamers in pursuit of honor. With added military-inspired elements in…
Wireless gaming headset designed for performance and comfort. Outfitted with all the surround sound, voice…
The H6 Flow's innovative compact design emphasizes GPU cooling with a strategically angled front corner,…