Intel Core i5-7600K Kaby Lake Processor Review




/ 3 years ago

« Previous Page

Next Page »

Overclocking


Overclocking

Overclocking the i5-7600K shouldn’t be a difficult task providing you employ a patient approach and gently find your chip’s maximum potential. Given the 5.1GHz figure I achieved on the i7-7700K, it wasn’t too bold to expect something similar or even greater. Please note, the overclocking was conducted on two samples to accurately gauge performance and find an indicator of the headroom you can expect. Initially, I managed to achieve 4.9GHz with a modest voltage setting of 1.335V before increasing the multiplier to x50. The 5.0GHz figure does need some extra voltage but it’s not a monumental amount and the average I experienced was 1.345v. After this was tested as completely stable, 5.1GHz became the next target but this does require a much larger voltage increase than the previous steps. Eventually, I settled on a 1.395V which deviates slightly due to load-line calibration.

Interestingly, the i5-7600K in both cases could reach 5.1GHz without surpassing the 1.4V mark. This is much better than the i7-7700K and ensured the temperatures were well within safe limits. In addition to multiplier overclock, I tried to enhance the 5.1GHz score with BCLK adjustments but this wouldn’t remain stable even though Kaby Lake isn’t restricted by pre-defined straps.

screenshot_19

Topics: , , , , ,

« Previous Page

Next Page »



Support eTeknix.com

By supporting eTeknix, you help us grow. And continue to bring you the latest news, reviews, and competitions. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter to keep up with the latest technology. Share your favourite articles, chat with the team and more. Also check out eTeknix YouTube, where you'll find our latest video reviews, event coverage and features in 4K!

eTeknix Facebook eTeknix Twitter eTeknix Instagram eTeknix Instagram

Check out our Latest Video

Comments

6 Responses to “Intel Core i5-7600K Kaby Lake Processor Review”
  1. Rowan Vermeulen says:

    Seems kind of weird not to include the 6600k in the benchmarks

    • John Williamson says:

      Yeah, it’s far from ideal to be honest, but the original sample we had some time ago was collected and can’t get hold one of. Perhaps, things will change in the future.

  2. Mansen says:

    RIP Eteknix.

  3. krypton says:

    Are the power consumption figures for just the CPU or rather for the full system?

  4. Shamz says:

    What a crappy processor. Intel is just milking people at this point and have been for years.
    I can’t wait to spend my money on Ryzen.

  5. Jordan says:

    Con – poor reaction to Zen…. How can this be a reaction to Zen when Zen isn’t out yet? The reaction to Zen will be the processor that comes out after. I think this a good step up from 6600k. Considering theres no other competitors in the market currently. Being able to hit 5ghz is the reason I ordered a 7600k to replace my one month old 6600k. My 6600k can only hit 4.4ghz without going over 1.4v.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!