The UK’s Advertising Standards Agency has asked popular YouTube vloggers Dan and Phil to remove an ad for Oreo cookies, after it was found to be misleading.
The ad in question featured the pair competing with each other to see how quickly they could lick the filling from some Oreos. The ASA found however that the ad didn’t really appear to be an ad, possibly misleading viewers into believing Dan and Phil didn’t actually receive compensation for the video.
The video was never actually removed in the end, due to the fact that Dan and Phil complied with requests from ASA by placing an annotation on the video that reads “This is a paid for advertisement” (see below).
“In this case because the ads were on online video channels that were usually non-promotional, the commercial intent should have been made clear before viewers clicked on the content”. – The ASA.
The incident has raised the issue of advertisers using YouTube personalities without actually making it very clear that such content is advertising. The ASA says that this is misleading viewers and could damage the trust they hold in their favourite YouTubers.
Source: The Independent
The H6 Flow's innovative compact design emphasizes GPU cooling with a strategically angled front corner,…
Featuring the advanced HERO 25K gaming sensor for sub-micron tracking and 10x power efficiency over…
The DeepCool ASSASSIN returns with a new stylish design, efficient cooling capacity and whisper-quiet operation.…
A game that pretty much anyone who remembers it that was thought to be lost…
Stellar Blade has soared to become the third highest-rated game by user score in PlayStation…
The release of NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has been hampered by significant supply issues,…