Here we can see the Fury offers almost identical performance when compared to the Fury X, and manages well above 60 frames-per-second. On the other hand, there’s a great deal of competition from the cheaper, and more compact R9 Nano.
During 1440P testing, the gap increased slightly but the experience is still incredible with an average frame-rate of 81.
There’s a huge leap in the performance demands at 4K, and it’s extremely challenging to surpass 40 frames-per-second. Here we can see the Fury remains playable, and should manage 60 frames-per-second with a few tweaks in the options menu. Amazingly, the Nano outperforms the Fury which is absolutely astounding.
The CORSAIR 3000D AIRFLOW presents a mid-tower ATX chassis with an efficient high-airflow design and…
FireCuda® 530 with heatsink offers a minimalist design, anodized aluminium body, and finely textured micropore…
💪 Resilient Against the Elements: Crafted with water and dirt-resistant materials, including natural rubber and…
【Better Heat Dissipation】The CPU cooler comes with 4 direct-contact heat pipes and a 120mm FDB…
【Stability is very good】 Non-slip rubber material base that provides heavy grip preventing sliding or…
The elegant design of the ASSASSIN IV WH is not just visually pleasing; it also…