With the recent release of the first fully DirectX 11 compatible graphics card, AMD have dealt a good first blow to nVidia, with the 5870 offering performance exceeding nVidias fastest single GPU card the GTX285 and the 5850 offering impressive performance for £100 less. However if history tells us anything it is that high end cards are not where most purchasers will be putting their hard earned cash and as a result the 5700 series will be far more critical to AMDs success in this latest generation of graphics cards, than the 5800 series. If this mid-range series of graphics card sell well then AMD will do very well the graphics hardware market, it really is that crucial.
In this preview we will be looking at what to expect from AMDs Radeon HD 5700 series cards, aimed at consumers who don’t want to spend £300 on a single graphics card but still want impressive single card performance and full DX11 compatibility. I’m sure that many 4800 series users will be keeping a keen eye on the 5700 series, it could well be an inexpensive upgrade route which gains them DX11 support.
Key Features of the HD5700 Series
Models
In the same vein as the 5800 series, the 5700 cards will come in two flavours with a numbering system that everyone should be familiar with. The first two digits denote the series the card belongs to and the last two digits denoting the performance of the card. So the 5700 series will have the 5750 and 5780 with the latter offering the best performance out of the two. This is a helpful if predictable system that allows an easy way to see which will offer the best performance, the higher the numbers the higher the performance. AMD are clearly sticking to what they know works, so anyone familiar with the previous generation of cards should have no problem grasping where each card sits in the model line up things.
Specifications
Codename: Juniper LE
Computing Power: 1.008 TeraFLOPs
Transistor Count: 1040 Million
Fabrication Process: 40nm
Stream Processors: 720
Texture Units: 36
Core Clock: 700MHz
Memory Clock: 1150MHz
Memory Type: GDDR5
Memory Size: 512MB or 1024Mb
Memory Bus Width: 128bit
Memory Bandwidth: 73.8 GB/s
Memory Bandwidth: 4.6Gbps
Idle Power Consumption: 16W
Max Power Consumption: 86W
Bus Interface: PCI-E 2.1 x16
Target Price: $109USD 512MB $129 1024MB
5770
Codename: Juniper XT
Computing Power: 1.36 TeraFLOPs
Transistor Count: 1040 Million
Fabrication Process: 40nm
Stream Processors: 800
Texture Units: 40
Core Clock: 850MHz
Memory Clock: 1150MHz
Memory Type: GDDR5
Memory Size: 1024Mb
Memory Bus Width: 128bit
Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s
Memory Data Rate: 4.8Gbps
Idle Power Consumption: 18W
Max Power Consumption: 108W
Bus Interface: PCI-E 2.1 x16
Target Price: $159USD
Well I’m sure you will agree that these are some impressive specifications for cards with Target prices of under $200USD and the 5770 appears to have the raw power to exceed performance of the current 4800 series, all but the x2 cards of course. As we’ve seen in the past, raw power isn’t always enough so we will have to wait for some benchmark results before drawing any conclusions, but once the drivers reach maturity I can see these cards being the budget and mid range choices for some time to come. From the pre-order prices that I’ve seen, UK retailers appear to be pricing the 5700 series very keenly, even with the poor exchange rate. Pre-Order prices are £115 to £120 for a 1GB 5750 and £130 to £145 for a 1GB 5770. With the minimal price difference of around £15 between the cheapest 5750 and 5770 it would be wise to go for the 5770, as it is unlikely that dormant stream processors and texture units on the 5750 could be unlocked and for such a small extra amount of cash not really worth the hassle of trying.
Conclusion
Although it is not clear yet if DX11 is anything more than marketing hype, it is clear that these two new graphics cards have the potential to become very popular upgrades for the mid-range user. They offer an impressive amount of hardware and performance for very little money, although this may not be enough for some 4800 series owners to take the plunge. Many users will however see these cards as an affordable route to DX11, which regardless of the near complete lack of compatible games currently released will still be very attractive. So assuming they are priced as keenly as the pre-order target prices suggest and the drivers mature quickly enough nVidia could well have some serious problems breaking into the mid range market that these cards are aimed at. We should see their response to the 5870 and 5850 in December 2009 and a response to the 5700 series in Q1/Q2 2010, but for now it appears that AMD have a good footing in the market. If the benchmarks are as impressive as the hardware and pricing, AMD appear to be onto a winning formula with the 5700 series.
Thanks for the writeup, and a well written concise number at that. Cheers.
Excellent article Mark, very informative.
Comparing the main specs of the 5750/5770 i.e Core Speed, Mem Speed, Shaders, Mem Bandwidth… it looks like they will perform near on equal with each other.
The 5770 will no doubt give higher frames per seconds in games, but probably not much more than 10% of the overall of a 5750…and going by those specs these cards will probably be getting atleast 50FPS at 1920×1080 in the up and coming Modern Warfare 2 anyway.
Hopefully we’ll have more info soon with some reviews and benchmarks to shed some light on my prediction.
I am however very surprised that the 5770 only has 800 shaders, not much of an increase over the 4770s 640.
4770 – 640
4870 – 800
5770 – 800
5850 – 1440
5850 – 1600
Even compared with the 2nd best in the 5800 series, there is a massive gap in shader power between 800 and 1440.
If i was AMD i would of made the 5750 with 800 shaders, and the 5770 with atleast 1000 shaders, as going by thge power requirements above both cards with these revised specs would still be below 150W and still only require x1 6-pin.
Nevermind though, i’m sure the 5700 series is going to be a best selling item for the end of 2009