✨ We've just launched our NEW website design!

Learn More Here
News

AMD Ryzen R5 1600X Benchmarks Appear

AMD Ryzen Box Art

We have seen a lot of Ryzen news lately, but they’ve been mostly focused on the biggest versions of the upcoming processor generation, the 1700 and the 1800 versions. Now we get a first peek at some Ryzen R5 benchmarks and they look quite promising.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X CPUz 0

The Ryzen R5 1600X is AMDs upcoming 6 core 12 thread processor and it is probably the one most people will opt for. It’s more budget oriented than the larger ones and still delivers a great performance. How great you ask? Well, we can have a first look at that now as both single and multicore benchmarks of this CPU have been “leaked”. The 1600X is the fastest of the 6 core versions of this upcoming CPU generation and it features a 3.4GHZ base clock with a boost of 3.7GHz. It also features the new auto-overclocking XFR feature that a lot of people are looking forward to.

It should be mentioned that these benchmarks come from CPU-Z and not the normal benchmark apps, but it still paints the first picture and wets the appetite for more. CPU-Z features a simple built-in benchmark feature and that’s the figures we get at this point.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X CPUz 1

The Ryzen R5 1600X scores extremely well in these synthetic benchmarks and lands above both Intel Broadwell-E 6-core chips and that’s impressive. While we don’t know all the details about the benchmark conditions, it’s safe to assume that it was running with a full boost to 3.7GHz and doing that, it beat out the i7-6850K which has a boost speed of 4GHz in the single-core tests.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X CPUz Singlecore

In the multi-threaded tests, it scores equally impressive and lands right below the i7-6960X chip with a couple hundred points less and it once again outperforms all the Intel 6-core chips. Considering that the i7-5960X is a $1000 chip and the Ryzen R5 1600X will cost about a quarter of that makes it even more impressive.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X CPUz Multicore

Related Articles

4 Comments

  1. Rats, only 10 times better multi thread score than my FX6350 &4.8 GHz. (1261) and 8 times single thread score (265).
    Not that CPU-Z is any good benchmark anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker!   eTeknix prides itself on supplying the most accurate and informative PC and tech related news and reviews and this is made possible by advertisements but be rest assured that we will never serve pop ups, self playing audio ads or any form of ad that tracks your information as your data security is as important to us as it is to you.   If you want to help support us further you can over on our Patreon!   Thank you for visiting eTeknix