Intel Core i7 13700K Review

Google Octane 2.0
Octane 2.0 is a benchmark that measures a JavaScript engine’s performance by running a suite of tests representative of certain use cases in JavaScript applications.
Google Octane now on Google Developers.

Taking a look at web browsing performance and we see some pretty respectable gains again, in favour of the 13700K with an 8% lead over the 7900X, and a 4% lead over the Ryzen 7950X, so at this point, it’s not looking great for AMD.
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Kraken is a JavaScript performance benchmark created by Mozilla that measures the speed of several different test cases extracted from real-world applications and libraries.
Mozilla Kraken now on Github.

In Mozilla Kraken, AMD managed to fight back taking the top spots over the 13700K, but with less than 2% in it, again, for the extra cost, it doesn’t impress me much for team red.
WebXPRT 4
WebXPRT 4 is a browser benchmark that compares the performance of almost any web-enabled device. It contains HTML5, JavaScript, and WebAssembly-based scenarios created to mirror the tasks you do every day: Photo Enhancement, Organize Album Using AI, Stock Option Pricing, Encrypt Notes and OCR Scan using WASM, Sales Graphs, and Online Homework. Use WebXPRT to see exactly how well different devices handle real-world tasks.
Mozilla Kraken now on Principled Technologies.

In WebXPRT 4, again, we see some small gains over the 12900K of around 4% but also see gains over both AMD Ryzen 9 CPUs, albeit of under 1%, but considering the 13700K comes in significantly cheaper, it’s another pretty big accomplishment for the blue team.
You seem to have got a really bad silicon. The i7 tested at computerbase consumes 25% less (gaming avg 120W).
They also kneecapped the AM5 and Intel chips at 5200 memory when we know both chips shine at 6000.
Computerbase did worse than that in the most crass way, they gave the raptor lake 5600 CL36s while AM5 CPUs got 5200MHz CL32s. AM5’s sweet spot is 6000Mhz. HUB has already shown the perf jump going from 5200 to 5600Mhz for Alder lake is getting it closer to 6000Mhz like perf. Hell they gave Alder Lake 4800Mhz. WTH? Atleast here eTecknix kept the RAM specs the same which is why eTeknix’s results more or less aligns with what HUB showed. Computerbase used to be good but now with their editorialized claims such as Intel Raptor Lake is the new gaming king, when really AM5 and Raptor Lake merely trade blows depending on the game, one has to seriously question if Intel had something to do with their *cough* editorial direction *cough*. The only thing of value in that article is the power consumption figures beyond that the whole set of benchmarks are null and void for sensible comparisons.
3090? Should have at least tested with a 3090 ti.