News

Meta is Building an AI to Fact-Check Wikipedia (And You Thought YOUR Job Stank)

Wikipedia, by and large, is a perfectly fine website when it comes to quickly looking up information for a fast answer. In terms of accuracy though, well, given that the website itself makes the clear distinction that it should never be used for any kind of academic purposes… Well, that kind of gives you an idea as to some of the problems it has in terms of, you know, actually being the gospel last word on any particular subject.

Following a report via SingularityHub, however, it seems that Meta (the company formally known as Facebook) has decided to attempt to take the Wikipedia challenge on. How? Well, through the creation of an AI that is going to (somehow) attempt to fact-check the entire website!

And just to put that into context, that’s about 6.5 million articles (just in English) and likely around 100 times more sources/citations! – And you thought your job stunk!

Meta Designing AI to Fact-Check Wikipedia

The key focus of this new AI from Meta will primary be to analyse what can be considered factual statements on Wikipedia articles and then cross-reference them with the source (citation) provided. It will then, presumably, check out the linked source to determine whether this is a reliable account, and likely after jumping through about a dozen more hoops, finally determine if the original statement can be considered accurate.

Yes, it is almost the stuff of nightmares that only an AI could probably handle without going completely insane!

A visual interpretation of an AI on its third day of work – Not entirely dissimilar to a complaints call centre worker on their second.

What Do We Think?

While certainly a noble goal, and certainly one that would give huge props to any AI that could actually achieve it, the chances of this being successful, even in a minimalist kind of way, surely has to be negligible at best. – Lest we forget, Wikipedia is effectively run by its own editing community who are, in many respects, a pathologically inclined law unto themselves (God help you if you attempt to edit and/or correct someone’s metaphorical baby on there.).

Put simply, with tens of thousands of changes being made every single day, that’s tens of thousands of opinions or skews on facts potentially being misrepresented and, by this new system, requiring ‘fact checking’. Exactly how an AI is going to be able to keep up with that, let alone handle the articles that aren’t getting regularly altered, is beyond my comprehension.

As above though, even if this AI finds even mild success, Meta will have a lot to boast about here.

What do you think though? Could you ever see an AI being able to handle Wikipedia? – Let us know in the comments!

Mike Sanders

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

AMD Launches Ryzen 7 8745H Without AI Processor

AMD has launched (thanks Wccftech) its new Ryzen 7 8745H APU, a part of the…

6 hours ago

MSI to Release New BIOS to Fix Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen CPU Instability

MSI has announced a new BIOS update in mid-August to address stability issues with Intel’s…

6 hours ago

200+ PC Models Compromised Due to Weak BIOS Passwords

Many PC models from top brands have faced security breaches due to a weak BIOS…

6 hours ago

One Piece Odyssey Sets Sail On Nintendo Switch Today!

Ahoy, Straw Hat fans! The wait is finally over. The beloved RPG adventure, ONE PIECE…

10 hours ago

Görvitor Dimmable Wireless Touch Lamps

【Wireless & 1800mAh Battery Operated】Touch lamps bedside use a rechargeable large capacity battery of 1800mAh,…

11 hours ago

Lepro GU10 LED Bulbs

Click to open expanded view F Energy efficiency label  Product Sheet Lepro GU10 LED Bulbs, Warm White…

11 hours ago