News

Meta is Building an AI to Fact-Check Wikipedia (And You Thought YOUR Job Stank)

Wikipedia, by and large, is a perfectly fine website when it comes to quickly looking up information for a fast answer. In terms of accuracy though, well, given that the website itself makes the clear distinction that it should never be used for any kind of academic purposes… Well, that kind of gives you an idea as to some of the problems it has in terms of, you know, actually being the gospel last word on any particular subject.

Following a report via SingularityHub, however, it seems that Meta (the company formally known as Facebook) has decided to attempt to take the Wikipedia challenge on. How? Well, through the creation of an AI that is going to (somehow) attempt to fact-check the entire website!

And just to put that into context, that’s about 6.5 million articles (just in English) and likely around 100 times more sources/citations! – And you thought your job stunk!

Meta Designing AI to Fact-Check Wikipedia

The key focus of this new AI from Meta will primary be to analyse what can be considered factual statements on Wikipedia articles and then cross-reference them with the source (citation) provided. It will then, presumably, check out the linked source to determine whether this is a reliable account, and likely after jumping through about a dozen more hoops, finally determine if the original statement can be considered accurate.

Yes, it is almost the stuff of nightmares that only an AI could probably handle without going completely insane!

A visual interpretation of an AI on its third day of work – Not entirely dissimilar to a complaints call centre worker on their second.

What Do We Think?

While certainly a noble goal, and certainly one that would give huge props to any AI that could actually achieve it, the chances of this being successful, even in a minimalist kind of way, surely has to be negligible at best. – Lest we forget, Wikipedia is effectively run by its own editing community who are, in many respects, a pathologically inclined law unto themselves (God help you if you attempt to edit and/or correct someone’s metaphorical baby on there.).

Put simply, with tens of thousands of changes being made every single day, that’s tens of thousands of opinions or skews on facts potentially being misrepresented and, by this new system, requiring ‘fact checking’. Exactly how an AI is going to be able to keep up with that, let alone handle the articles that aren’t getting regularly altered, is beyond my comprehension.

As above though, even if this AI finds even mild success, Meta will have a lot to boast about here.

What do you think though? Could you ever see an AI being able to handle Wikipedia? – Let us know in the comments!

Mike Sanders

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

EKWB 360mm EK-Nucleus CR360 Dark AIO CPU Liquid Cooler Intel/AMD

The EK-Nucleus AIO CR360 Dark is an all-in-one liquid cooling solution offering a pitch-black cooler…

4 mins ago

Montech KING 95 Red Mid Tower PC Case

Meet the KING 95 mid tower ATX gaming case. Featuring the allure of resilient curved…

10 mins ago

Fractal Pop Air RGB Cyan Core Mid Tower Tempered Glass PC Case

Fractal fuse flair with function in the new Pop series of cases that does not…

12 mins ago

Seagate FireCuda 530 Heatsink (EK) 500GB M.2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD/Solid State Drive

FireCuda® 530 with heatsink offers a minimalist design, anodized aluminium body, and finely textured micropore…

16 mins ago

Cooler Master TD300 Mesh Mini Tower micro-ATX Tempered Glass Black PC Case

TD300 Mesh brings together modern presentation and performance with its three dimensional artistic mesh front…

22 mins ago

be quiet! System Power 10 750W 80+ Bronze Wired Power Supply

System Power 10 650W has been built with price-conscious users in mind that do not…

31 mins ago