Featured

The Battle of The Netbooks: Intel vs AMD

 

Atom vs Fusion performance courtesy of Anandtech

If you thought things were quite tight up until now then the gap widens here. Intel graphics on their Atom processors are notoriously poor, most Atoms come equipped with the Intel GMA 3150 media accelerator for graphics support. The frequency of this graphics unit varies between the type of Atom for example more recent Cedar Trail Atoms clock at about 600MHz whilst older ones like the N570 clock at 400MHz.

Now a quick overview of what AMD netbook processors offer in terms of graphics. Well we know the AMD netbook units consume more power so we would expect dramatically better GPU performance to compensate for that. That’s exactly what AMD give and this is why although AMD is losing in the desktop market, it is still doing very well in the netbook market.

The Intel GMA 3150 in a generic GPU benchmark scores between 50 to 75 points. If we then compare that to AMDs worst netbook GPU which is the HD 6250 it scores 186 points. And if we take the best the HD 6320 we see AMD soaring further ahead with 240 points which is about 500% more performance.

Now to some a netbook doesn’t need to have a strong GPU and this is why Intel is still in the market. Netbooks tend to need a strong CPU with a fast hard drive for functionality in office type applications and web browsing. But it would be naive to think using a browser, power point or watching youtube videos that the GPU isn’t used on a regular basis. This is why AMD’s fusion is so competitive in the netbook market: you get roughly equivalent CPU performance with far superior GPU performance for a lower price. The only downside for AMD is that they haven’t got as much power efficiency as Intel and they struggle to meet demand.

So to put all these figures into context lets take a look at a netbook GPU comparison table based on the generic GPU benchmark called PassMark:

  • HD 6320, 240 points, 18W
  • HD 6310, 193 points, 18W
  • HD 6290, 192 points, 9W
  • HD 6250, 186 points, 9W
  • Intel Media Accelerator 3150, 74 points, 3-10W depending on CPU
  • Intel GMA 3150 express, 69 points, 3-10W depending on CPU

To pull everything together lets move onto how Intel and AMD shape up against each other when we bring price and power consumption into consideration.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Ryan Martin

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

MSI CLUTCH GM41 V2 RGB Optical Lightweight Gaming Mouse

Take advantage of advanced, ultra-light gameplay with the CLUTCH GM41 Lightweight V2 gaming mouse from…

9 hours ago

Samsung 990 PRO 4TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD/Solid State Drive with Heatsink PC/PS5

Reach max performance of PCIe® 4.0.Experience longer-lasting, opponent-blasting speed. The in-house controller's smart heat control…

9 hours ago

MSI AMD B450 GAMING PLUS MAX AM4 ATX Motherboard

MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX is designed with tons of connectivity, flexible tools, and DDR4…

10 hours ago

ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3402VA-KN521W 14″ 2.8K OLED 90Hz i9 Laptop

The powerful and compact Zenbook 14 OLED is just 16.9 mm slim and 1.39 kg…

10 hours ago

ZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16GB AMP HOLO Ada Lovelace Graphics Card

The tried-and-true HoloBlack design returns in the ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AMP…

10 hours ago

Crucial T705 2TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 5.0 SSD/Solid State Drive with Heatsink

Hold on tight - the Crucial® T705 Gen5 NVMe® SSD is taking Gen5 performance to…

10 hours ago