Featured

The Battle of The Netbooks: Intel vs AMD

 

Atom vs Fusion performance courtesy of Anandtech

If you thought things were quite tight up until now then the gap widens here. Intel graphics on their Atom processors are notoriously poor, most Atoms come equipped with the Intel GMA 3150 media accelerator for graphics support. The frequency of this graphics unit varies between the type of Atom for example more recent Cedar Trail Atoms clock at about 600MHz whilst older ones like the N570 clock at 400MHz.

Now a quick overview of what AMD netbook processors offer in terms of graphics. Well we know the AMD netbook units consume more power so we would expect dramatically better GPU performance to compensate for that. That’s exactly what AMD give and this is why although AMD is losing in the desktop market, it is still doing very well in the netbook market.

The Intel GMA 3150 in a generic GPU benchmark scores between 50 to 75 points. If we then compare that to AMDs worst netbook GPU which is the HD 6250 it scores 186 points. And if we take the best the HD 6320 we see AMD soaring further ahead with 240 points which is about 500% more performance.

Now to some a netbook doesn’t need to have a strong GPU and this is why Intel is still in the market. Netbooks tend to need a strong CPU with a fast hard drive for functionality in office type applications and web browsing. But it would be naive to think using a browser, power point or watching youtube videos that the GPU isn’t used on a regular basis. This is why AMD’s fusion is so competitive in the netbook market: you get roughly equivalent CPU performance with far superior GPU performance for a lower price. The only downside for AMD is that they haven’t got as much power efficiency as Intel and they struggle to meet demand.

So to put all these figures into context lets take a look at a netbook GPU comparison table based on the generic GPU benchmark called PassMark:

  • HD 6320, 240 points, 18W
  • HD 6310, 193 points, 18W
  • HD 6290, 192 points, 9W
  • HD 6250, 186 points, 9W
  • Intel Media Accelerator 3150, 74 points, 3-10W depending on CPU
  • Intel GMA 3150 express, 69 points, 3-10W depending on CPU

To pull everything together lets move onto how Intel and AMD shape up against each other when we bring price and power consumption into consideration.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Ryan Martin

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

Twin Pack Soehnle Fit Connect 100 Bluetooth Fitness Tracker iOS/Android

Connection to the Soehnle Connect app for smartphone with simple operation and full data control.…

3 hours ago

MSI Intel PRO B760-P WIFI DDR4 ATX Motherboard

Meet the PRO B760-P WIFI DDR4, here to support the very latest 13th Generation Intel…

3 hours ago

Gigabyte AMD Ryzen B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2 AM4 PCIe 4.0 ATX Motherboard

In the dark, starless night, the falcon strikes fear into the heart of its prey.…

3 hours ago

HYTE Y40 Black Panoramic Glass Mid-Tower ATX Case

The all-new Y40 is designed to wow and priced to thrill while defining new industry…

3 hours ago

Corsair RMe Series 850 Watt Compact Fully Modular PCIE 5.0 80+ Gold PSU/Power Supply ATX3.0

CORSAIR RMe Series Fully Modular Low-Noise Power Supplies provide quiet, reliable power with 80 PLUS…

3 hours ago

Corsair 2000D Airflow Black Mini-ITX Mini Tower High Airflow Case Black

The CORSAIR 2000D AIRFLOW is a Mini-ITX small-form-factor case with phenomenal cooling thanks to steel…

3 hours ago