Featured

Nvidia GTX 1650 Vs AMD RX 570 Overclocking Showdown

Nvidia GTX 1650 Vs AMD RX 570

The Nvidia GTX 1650 landed recently to little fanfare. It’s a budget card built for the affordable and entry-level PC gaming market. It’s hardly built to light your trousers on fire with excitement, but it certainly has a place in the market. Not everyone can afford a £1000+ flagship GPU, and not everyone needs one. However, when we reviewed it, we held off on the overclocking results, letting the drivers mature a little.

In The Green Corner

We have the ASUS RoG STRIX GTX 1650 OC Edition. We reviewed that a few weeks ago, which you can read here. It features the new Turing architecture, 12nm FitFET design, and 4GB of GDDR5 memory.

In The Red Corner

We’ve got some strong competition in this price range, and it comes from AMD. The RX 570 is one of the most affordable AMD cards on the market today. Sure, it’s been around since the stone age, but when it comes to affordable 1080p gaming, it’s still capable of holding its own against Nvidia.

The card we’re using today is the PowerColor Red Devil RX570. It uses the Polaris chipset, with a 14nm design, and features 4GB of GDDR5. You can check out our review of it from two years ago here. However, if you read our more recent GPU reviews, you will find that is has been re-tested since then.

The Differences

Well, the new Nvidia chipset is literally new, and as such, it has some of the lowest power consumption on the market today. That quickly translates to lower heat, and lower noise. The AMD chipset is pretty old now and has much higher power consumption, and usually they run hotter, etc. They do both cost around the same though, and we already know the RX570 is around 10% faster from our GPU reviews. However, this time around we’ll run them both at stock, and both overclocked, to see just what value we can get from either card.

Overclocks

The Nvidia card delivered a promising overclock, hitting +150 MHz on the GPU core and +750 MHz on the memory. We actually got that as high as +175 MHz and +780 MHz in synthetic benchmarks, but it proved to be unstable in gaming.

The AMD card was already much more highly overclocked from stock out of the box, and managed clocks of 1400 MHz on the GPU core and 1900 MHz on the memory.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Peter Donnell

As a child still in my 30's (but not for long), I spend my day combining my love of music and movies with a life-long passion for gaming, from arcade classics and retro consoles to the latest high-end PC and console games. So it's no wonder I write about tech and test the latest hardware while I enjoy my hobbies!

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless Gaming Headset Review

SteelSeries has many of the absolute best all-round gaming headsets on the market today, and…

2 hours ago

ASUS Faces Backlash Over $2,750 Charge for Minor RTX 4090 Repair

ASUS is facing backlash over high repair costs for its RTX 4090 graphics card. Customers…

4 hours ago

Bungie Revives Marathon Trilogy for Free on Steam

Fans of classic first-person shooters are in for a treat as Bungie brings its Marathon…

4 hours ago

Manor Lords’ New Update Fixes Archer Power and Reduces Ale Drinking

The newest update for Manor Lords has brought significant changes to its gameplay dynamics, specifically…

4 hours ago

AMD to Transform Gaming Graphics with Ground-Up RDNA 5 Architecture

AMD is set to revolutionize gaming graphics with its upcoming RDNA 5 architecture, a complete…

1 day ago

ASUS ROG Strix LC II 360 White Edition Performance RGB AIO CPU Liquid Cooler

Intricate new designs on ROG Strix LC II 360 ARGB showcase the iconic ROG aesthetic,…

2 days ago